1878

We desire in the first place to record our obligations to General Henry Babbage for the frank and liberal manner in which he has assisted the Committee, not only by placing at their disposal all the information within his reach, but by exhibiting and explaining to them, at no small loss of time and sacrifice of personal convenience, the machinery and papers left by his father, the late Mr. Babbage. Without the valuable aid thus kindly rendered to them by General Babbage it would have been simply impossible for the Committee to have come to any definite conclusions, or to present any useful report.

We refer to the chapter in Mr. Babbage's ‘Passages from the Life of a Philosopher,’ and to General Menabrea's paper, translated and annotated by Lady Lovelace, in the third volume of Taylor's ‘Scientific Memoirs,’ for a general description of the Analytical Engine.

The application of arithmetic to calculating machines differs from
ordinary clockwork, and from geometrical construction, in that it is
essentially discontinuous. In common clockwork, if two wheels are
geared together so as to have a velocity ratio of 10 to 1 (say), when
the faster wheel moves through the space of one tooth, the angular
space moved through by the slower wheels is one tenth of a tooth. Now
in a calculating machine, which is to work with actual figures and to
print them, this is exactly what we *don't* want. We require
the second wheel not to move at all until it has to make a complete
step, and then we require that step to be taken all at once. The time
can be very easily read from the hands of a clock, and so can the gas
consumption from an ordinary counter; but a moment's reflection will
show what a mess any such machinery would make of an attempt at
printing.

This necessity of jumping discontinuously from one figure to another is the fundamental distinction between calculating and numbering machines on the one hand, and millwork or clockwork on the other. A parallel distinction is found in pure mathematics, between the theory of numbers on the one hand, and the doctrine of continuous variation, of which the Differential Calculus is the type, on the other. A calculating machine may exist in either case. The common slide-rule is, in fact, a very powerful calculating machine in which the continuous process is used, and the planimeter is another.

Geometrical construction, being essentially continuous, would be quite out of place in the calculating machine which has to print its results. Linkwork also, for the same reason, is out of place as an auxiliary in any form to the calculation. It may be of service in simplifying the construction of the machine; but it must not enter into the work as an equivalent for arithmetical computation.

Fig. 1. |

The primary movement of calculating engines is the *discontinuous
train*, of which one form is sketched in the accompanying diagram
(fig. 1):—B is the follower, an ordinary spur wheel with (say) 10
teeth; A is its driver, and this has only a single tooth. With a
suitable proportion of parts, the single tooth of A only moves B one
interval for a whole revolution of A; for it only gears with B by
means of this single tooth. When that is not in gear, A simply slips
past the teeth of B without moving the latter.

All the other machinery of calculating engines leads up to and makes use of this, or of some transformation of it, as its means of dealing with units of whatever decimal rank, instead of allowing indefinite fractions of units to appear in the result which has to be printed from.

The primary operation of calculation is counting: the secondary
operation is addition, with its counterpart, subtraction. The
addition and subtraction are in reality effected by means of counting,
which still remains the primary operation; but the necessity for
economising labour and time forces upon us devices for performing the
counting processes in a summary manner, and for allowing several of
them to go on simultaneously in the calculating engine. For, if we
use simple counting as our only operation, and suppose our engine set
to 2312 (say), then, in order to add 3245 to it by mere repetition, we
have 3245 unit operations to perform, and this is practically
intolerable. If, however, we can separate the counting, so as to
count on units to units only, tens to tens only, hundreds to hundreds
only, and so forth, we shall only have

turns of the handle, as against 3245 turns. In general terms the
number of operations will be measured by the sum of the digits of the
number, instead of by the actual number itself. This is exactly
analogous to what we should do ourselves in ordinary arithmetic in
working an addition sum, if we had not learnt the addition table, but
had to count on our fingers in order to add. This statement of the
work is, however, incomplete. In the first place the convenience of
machinery obliges us to provide 10 steps for each figure, whatever it
may be, and there must be an arrangement by which the setting of the
figure to be added shall cause a wheel to *gain ground* by so
many steps as the number indicates, and to *mark time* without
gaining ground for the other steps up to 10. Thus, in adding 7 our
driver must make a complete turn or 10 steps, equivalent to 1 step of
the follower; but only 7 of these steps of the driver must be
effective steps, the others being skipped steps. There are various
devices for this. One of the simplest and most direct is that used in
Thomas's ‘Arithmomètre;’¹ another is the Reducing
Bar used by Mr. Babbage.² In the second place,
the *carrying* has to be provided for just as in ordinary
addition of numbers. Taking account of all this, it follows that by
separating the counting on the whole into counting, on figure by
figure, the number of separate steps is reduced from that expressed by
the number itself to eleven times the number of its digits; that is to
say, for example, the addition of the number 73592 to any other number
is reduced from 73592 to 55 steps, and although of this latter some
are slipped, there is no gain of time thereby, except in so far as
several of the steps may be made simultaneously. The ordinary engines
beat the human calculator in respect of adding all the figures
simultaneously; but Mr. Babbage was the first to devise a method of
performing all the carrying simultaneously too.

Mechanical invention has not yet gone beyond the reduction of the
distinct steps involved in the addition of a number consisting of
*n* digits to less than 11*n*; practically, from the
necessity of accompanying the carrying with a *warning* step,
rather more are required.

In all the calculating machines at present known, including Mr. Babbage's analytical engine, multiplication is really effected by repeated addition. It is true that, by a multiplication of parts, more than one addition may be going on simultaneously; but it yet remains true, as a matter of mechanism, that the process is purely one of iterated addition.

By means of reversing wheels or trains, subtraction is as easily and
directly performed as addition, and that without becoming in any
degree a tentative process. But it is important to observe that the
process can be made tentative, so as to give notice when a minuend is,
or is about to become, exhausted. This is the necessary preparation
for division, which is thus essentially a tentative process. That
does not take it out of the power of the machine, because the machine
may be, and is, so devised as to accept and act upon the notice.
Nevertheless it is a step *alieni
generis* from the direct processes of addition, multiplication,
and subtraction. It need hardly be stated that the process of
obtaining a quotient consists in counting the number of subtractions
employed, up to the machine giving notice of the minuend being
exhausted.

Another essentially distinct train is involved in the decimal shift of the unit, in all the four elementary rules. This is most simply and most commonly effected by the sliding of an axis or frame longitudinally, after the manner of a common sliding-scale or rule, so as to bring either the figures, or the teeth which represent them, against those to which their decimal places correspond, and to no others. In multiplication and division, this means a shift for each step of the multiplication and division.

*The mill*.—The fundamental operation of Mr. Babbage's analytical engine is simple addition. This and the other elementary rules of subtraction, multiplication, and division, and all combinations of these, are performed in what is called “*the mill*.” All the shifts which have to take place, such as changing addition into subtraction by throwing a reversing train into gear, or the shift of the decimal place, carrying and borrowing, and so forth, are effected by a system of rotating cams acting upon or actuated by bell-cranks, tangs, and other similar devices commonly used in shifting machinery, sometimes under the name of clutches or escapements. These clutches and bell cranks control the purely additive and carrying processes effected in the additive trains described in the note to § I., and,*being themselves suitably directed*, secure that the proper processes shall be performed upon the proper subject-matter of operation, and duly recorded, or used, as may be required.*The store.*—A series of columns, each containing a series of wheels, constitutes the store. This store, which may be in three or more dimensions, both receives the results of operations performed in the mill, and serves as a store for the numbers which are to be used in the mill, whether as original or as fresh subjects of operation in it. Each column in the store corresponds to a definite number, to which it is set either automatically or by hand, and the number of digits in this number is limited by the number of wheels carried on the shaft of the column. The wheels gear into a series of racks, which can be thrown into or out of gear by means of the cards.*Variable cards.*—All the numbers which are the subject of operation in the mill, whether they are the result of previous operations therein, or new numbers to be operated upon for the first time, are introduced to it in the form of Jacquard³ cards, such as are used in weaving. One set of wires or axes transfers the numbers on these cards to the subject of operation in the mill, exactly as similar cards direct which of the warp threads are to be pushed up, and which down, in the Jacquard loom. The mill itself punches such cards when required.*Operation cards.*—A different set of cards selects and prescribes the sequence of operations. These act, not upon the number wheels of the mill or store, but upon the cams and clutches which direct the gearing of these wheels and trains. Thus, in such an operation as (*a**b*+*c*)*d*, we should require:—1st, 4 variable cards with the numbers *a*,*b*,*c*,*d*.2nd, an operation card directing the machine to multiply *a*and*b*together.3rd, a record of the result, namely the product *ab*=*p*, as a fifth variable card.4th, an operation card directing the addition of *p*and*c*.5th, a record of the result, namely the sum *p*+*c*=*q*, as a 6th variable card,6th, an operation card directing the machine to multiply *q*and*d*together.7th, a record of the result, namely the product *qd*=*p*_{2}, either printed as a final result or punched in a seventh variable card.

It has already been remarked that the direct work of the engine is a
combination and repetition of the processes of addition and
subtraction. But in leading up to any given datum by these
combinations, there is no difficulty in ascertaining tentatively when
this datum is reached, or about to be reached. This is strictly a
tentative process, and it appears probable that each such
*tentamen* requires to be specially
provided for, so as to be duly noted in the subsequent operations of
the machine. There is, however, no necessary restriction to any
particular process, such as division; but any direct combination of
arithmetic, such as the formation of a polynomial, can be made to lead
up to a given value in such a manner as to yield the solution of the
corresponding equation. In any such process, however, it is evident
that there can be only (to choose a simile from mechanism) one degree
of freedom; otherwise the problem would yield a locus, indeterminate
alike in common arithmetic, and as regards the capabilities of the
machine. The possibility of several roots would be a difficulty of
exactly the same character as that which presents itself in Horner's
solution of equations, and the same may be said of imaginary roots
differing but little from equality. These, however, are extreme
cases, with which it is usually possible to deal specially as they
arise, and they need not be considered as detracting materially from
the value of the engine. Theoretically, the grasp of the engine
appears to include the whole synthesis of arithmetic, together with
one degree of freedom tentatively. Its capability thus extends to any
system of operations or equations which leads to a single numerical
result.

It appears to have been primarily designed with the following general
object in view—to be coextensive with numerical synthesis and
solution, without any special adaptation to a particular class of
work, such as we see in the difference engine. It includes that
*à majori*, and it can either
calculate any single result, or tabulate any consecutive series of
results just as well. But the absence of any speciality of adaptation
is one of the leading features of the design.

Mr. Babbage had also considered the indication of the passage through infinity as well as through zero, and also the approach to imaginary roots. For details upon these points we must refer to his ‘Passages from the Life of a Philosopher.’

The only part of the Analytical engine which has yet been put together is a small portion of “the mill,” sufficient to show the methods of addition and subtraction, and of what Mr. Babbage called his “anticipating carriage.” It is understood that General Babbage will (independently of this report) publish a full account of this method. No further mention of it will therefore be made here.

A small portion of the work is in gun-metal wheels and cranks, mounted for the most part on steel shafts. But the greater part of the wheels are in a sort of pewter hardened with zinc. This was adopted from motives of economy. They are for the most part not cast, but moulded by pressure, and the moulds of most of them are in existence.

A large number of drawings of the machinery are
also in existence. It is supposed that these are complete to the
extent of giving an account of every particular movement essential to
the design of the engine; but, for the most part, they are not
*working drawings*, that is to say, they are not drawings
suited to be sent straight to the pattern or fitting shop, to be
rendered in metal. There are also drawings for the erection of the
engine, and there appears to be a complete set of descriptive notes of
it in Mr. Babbage's “mechanical notation.” There remains,
however, a great deal to be done in the way of calculating quantities
and proportions, and in the preparation of working drawings, before
any work could actually be set in hand, even if the design be really
complete. There is some doubt on this point as the matter stands, and
it certainly would be unsafe to rely upon the design being really
complete, until the working drawings had been got out. Mechanical
engineers are well aware that no complex design can be trusted without
this test, at least.

It was Mr. Babbage's rule, in designing mechanism, in the first place to work to his object, in utter disregard of any questions of complexity. This is a good rule in all devising of methods, whether analytical, mechanical, or administrative. But it leaves in doubt, until the design finally leaves the inventor's hands in a finished state, whether it really represents what is meant to be rendered in metal, or whether it is simply a provisional solution, to be afterwards simplified.

It has not been possible for us to form any exact conclusion as to the
cost. Nevertheless there are some data in existence which appear to
fix a lower limit to the cost. Mr. Babbage, in his published papers,
talks of having 1,000 columns of wheels, each containing 50 distinct
wheels; this apparently refers to his *store*. Besides the
many thousand moulded pewter wheels for these, and the axes on which
they are mounted, there is the *mill*, also consisting of a
series of columns of wheels and of a vast machinery of cams, clutches,
and cranks for their control and connection, so as to bring them
within the directing power of the Jacquard systems of variable cards
and operation cards. Without attempting any exact estimate, we may
say that it would surprise us very much if it were found possible to
obtain tenders for less than 10,000*l*., while it would pretty
certainly cost a considerable sum to put the design in a fit state for
obtaining tenders. On the other hand, it would not surprise us if the
cost were to reach three or four times the amount above suggested.

It is understood that towards the close of his life Mr. Babbage had contemplated carrying out the manufacture of the engine on a smaller scale, confining himself to 25 figures instead of 50, and to 200 columns instead of 1000 or more. This would of course reduce the amount of the metal-work proportionately, but we do not think that it would materially reduce the charge which we anticipate for bringing the design into working order.

The questions of strength and durability had by no means escaped Mr. Babbage's attention, and a great deal of his detail bears marks of having been designed with especial reference to these two points. That was essential in a large and complex engine with some thousands of wheels, all requiring at some time or other, although not simultaneously, to be driven by the means of one shaft. This necessarily throws a great deal of pressure, and also a great deal of wear and tear, on the main driving shaft and the gear immediately connected with it. We have no means of knowing, in the present state of the design, to what extent Mr. Babbage had succeeded in reducing this, or whether he had always been successful in arranging his cams and cranks so as to secure the best working angles, and to avoid their being jammed at dead points or otherwise. Giving him full credit for being quite aware of the importance of this, we cannot but doubt whether the design was ever in a sufficiently forward state to enable him, or any one else, to speak with certainty on this point. Several of the existing calculating machines show signs of weakness in the driving-pinions.

One of the movements apparently necessary to the tentative processes of the engine is, when the spur-wheels on a given shaft have been brought into certain definite positions depending on previous operations, to bring up a sharp straight edge against them in a plane passing through the axis of the shaft. This pushes some to right and others to left, according to the position of the crown of the tooth relatively to the straight edge. This operation is necessary to secure that the clearance of the different parts of the machinery, whether originally provided in order to allow it to work smoothly, or whether afterwards increased by working, shall not introduce a numerical error into the result. The principle of this operation is used generally throughout the analytical engine. Its consequent effect, both in respect of the work which it throws upon the main driving gear, and of the wear of the parts which it pushes, forms an important element in considering the durability of the machine. This bar also serves the purpose of locking part of the machine when required.

On the other hand, it is to be remarked, that the use of springs has been wholly discarded by Mr. Babbage, as directors of motion, although he occasionally uses them for return motions.

It has been already remarked that one of the main features of the engine is, that its function is coextensive with numerical synthesis and solution, and that there is an absence of any special adaptation. In thus widening the sphere of its capability, it is made to diverge from the general tendency of mechanical design, which is towards the selection and particularization of the work to be performed, and the restriction of the machinery to one particular cycle of operation, usually within close numerical limits, as well as limited in kind. Nevertheless, modern engineering practice finds ample room for “universal” drills, shaping tools, and other machines having very general adjustments and applications. But it remains practically true that each step of freedom of adjustment is also a step in diminution of special aptitude.

While the analytical engine is capable of turning out a single result, as the combination of a complex series of numbers and operations performed upon them, it can also yield a series of such results in a consecutive form, and thus give tabulated results. Only it is not restricted, as is the difference engine, to the special method of tabulation by finite differences, nor is tabulation its primary function or intention. If its actual capabilities are found to realize the intentions of its inventor, it will tabulate all functions which are within the reach of numerical synthesis, and those direct inversions of it which are known under the name of solutions. It deals, however, with number, and not with analytical form.

Theoretically it might supersede the difference engine,
*à majori*; but for reasons
already stated, the specialization of the difference engine would
probably give it an advantage over the more powerful engine, when the
work was specially suited to finite differences.

There would remain much work, tabular and other, for which differences
are not very directly suited. Among these may be mentioned the
determination of heavy series of constants and of definite functions
of them, such as Bernoulli's numbers,
Σ*x*^{−n}, coefficients of
various expansions of functions, and inversions of known expansions,
solutions of simultaneous equations with large numerical coefficients
and many variables, including, as a particular, but important case,
the practical correction of observations by the method of least
squares. If all sorts of heavy work of this kind could be easily and
quickly, as well as certainly, done, by merely selecting or punching a
few Jacquard cards and turning a handle, not only much saving of
labour would result, but much which is now out of human possibility
would be brought within easy reach.

If intelligently directed and saved from wasteful use, such a machine might mark an era in the history of computation, as decided as the introduction of logarithms in the seventeenth century did in trigonometrical and astronomical arithmetic. Care might be required to guard against misuse, especially against the imposition of Sisyphean tasks upon it by influential sciolists. This, however, is no more than has happened in the history of logarithms. Much work has been done with them which could more easily have been done without them, and the old reproach is probably true, that more work has been spent upon making tables than has been saved by their use. Yet, on the whole, there can be no reasonable doubt that the first calculation of logarithmic tables was an expenditure of capital which has repaid itself over and over again. So probably would the analytical engine, whatever its cost, if we could be assured of its success.

Without prejudging the general question referred to us as to the advisability of completing Mr. Babbage's engine in the exact shape in which it exists in the machinery and designs left by its inventor, it is open to consideration whether some modification of it, to the sacrifice of some portion of its generality, would not reduce the cost, and simplify the machinery, so as to bring it within the range of both commercial and mechanical certainty. The “mill,” for example, is an exceedingly good mechanical arrangement for the operations of addition and subtraction, and with a slight modification, with or without store-columns, for multiplication. We have already called attention to the imperfection of the existing machines, which show weakness and occasional uncertainty. It is at least worth consideration whether a portion of the analytical engine might not thus be advantageously specialized, so as to furnish a better multiplying machine than we at present possess. This, we have reason to believe, is a great desideratum both in public and private offices, as well as in aid of mathematical calculators.

Another important desideratum to which the machine might be adapted, without the introduction of any tentative processes (out of which the complications of the machinery chiefly arise) is the solution of simultaneous equations containing many variables. This would include a large part of the calculations involved in the practical application of the method of least squares. The solution of such equations can always be expressed as the quotient of two determinants, and the obtaining this quotient is a final operation, which may be left to the operator to perform by ordinary arithmetic, or which may be the subject of a separate piece of machinery so that the more direct work of forming the determinant, which is a mere combination of the three direct operations of addition, subtraction, and multiplication, may be entirely freed from the tentative process of division, which would thus be prevented from complicating the direct machinery. In the absence of a special engine for the purpose, the solution of large sets of simultaneous equations is a most laborious task, and a very expensive process indeed, when it has to be paid for, in the cases in which the result is imperatively needed. An engine that would do this work at moderate cost would place a new and most valuable computing power at the disposal of analysts and physicists.

Other special modifications of the engine might also find a fair field for reproductive employment. We do not think it necessary to go into these questions at any great length, because they involve a departure, in the way of restriction and specialization, from Mr. Babbage's idea, of which generality was the leading feature. Nevertheless, we think that we should be guilty of an omission, if we were to fail to suggest them for consideration.

- We are of opinion that the labours of Mr. Babbage, firstly on his Difference Engine, and secondly on his Analytical Engine, are a marvel of mechanical ingenuity and resource.
- We entertain no doubt as to the utility of such an engine as was in his contemplation when he undertook the invention of his analytical engine, supposing it to be successfully constructed and maintained in efficiency.
- We do not consider that the possibilities of its misuse are any serious drawback to its use or value.
- Apart from the question of its saving labour in operations now possible, we think the existence of such an instrument would place within reach much which, if not actually impossible, has been too close to the limits of human skill and endurance to be practically available.
- We have come to the conclusion that in the present state of the design of the engine it is not possible for us to form any reasonable estimate of its cost, or of its strength and durability.
- We are also of opinion that, in the present state of the design, it is not more than a theoretical possibility; that is to say, we do not consider it a certainty that it could be constructed and put together so as to run smoothly and correctly, and to do the work expected of it.
- We think that there remains much detail to be worked out, and possibly some further invention needed, before the design can be brought into a state in which it would be possible to judge whether it would really so work.
- We think that a further cost would have to be incurred in order to bring the design to this stage, and that it is just possible that a mechanical failure might cause this expenditure to be lost.
- While we are unable to frame any exact estimates, we have reason to think that the cost of the engine, after the drawings are completed, would be expressed in tens of thousands of pounds at least.
- We think there is even less possibility of forming an opinion as to its strength and durability than as to its feasibility or cost.
- Having regard to all these considerations, we have come, not without reluctance, to the conclusion, that we cannot advise the British Association to take any steps, either by way of recommendation or otherwise, to procure the construction of Mr. Babbage's Analytical Engine and the printing tables by its means.
- We think it, however, a question for further consideration whether some specialized modification of the engine might not be worth construction, to serve as a simple multiplying machine, and another modification of it arranged for the calculation of determinants, so as to serve for the solution of simultaneous equations. This, however, inasmuch as it involves a departure from the general idea of the inventor, we regard as lying outside the terms of reference, and therefore perhaps rather for the consideration of Mr. Babbage's representatives than ours. We accordingly confine ourselves to the mere mention of it by way of suggestion.

Fig. 2. |

- Let ZO (fig. 2) be a plate with ten
ribs of different lengths, A
*a*, B*b*, . . . . K*k*soldered on it. Let M*m*be a square axis on which the wheel N is made to slide by the fork P. Then, supposing N to have teeth which can engage in the ribs A*a*, &c., when the plate is pushed past the wheel N, the number of teeth through which the wheel N, carrying with it the shaft M*m*, is made to rotate, depends upon the number of ribs in which it engages, and this depends upon how far along the axis N is made to slide by means of the fork P. If this fork is set opposite the line marked 3, M*m*will turn through a space equivalent to 3 teeth. If a wheel, keyed to the shaft M*m*, be geared to other wheels, this enables us to add any digit to any number at a single motion of the plate, by simply changing the position of P to suit the digit required. This is the principle used in Thomas's arithmomètre, only that there the traversing plate is replaced by a rotating cylinder.

Fig. 3. |

- Suppose A
*a*, B*b*, . . . . F*f*(fig. 3) to be a series of racks passing through mortices in a plate*xz*, and meeting a series of spur-wheels mounted loose on a shaft, so that each wheel gears with one of the racks at the line*pq*, and that all the whole series can be thrown in or out of gear together. Starting with them out of gear, let the racks be drawn out through the plate*xy*as indicated. Next throw the shaft*pq*into gear, and then press a plate PQ against the ends of the tacks, pushing them back until the plates PQ and*xy*meet. The each wheel on*pq*will turn through the number of teeth corresponding to the original projection of the racks. In this way, if the wheels on*pq*stood at any given number, say 543243, we should have added 314236 to them, and they would then stand at the sum of these two numbers, namely, 857479. This, it will be observed, makes no provision for carrying. PQ is the reducing bar. In practice the arrangement is usually circular, the bar PQ revolving about an axis parallel to itself instead of sliding. If the numbers on the wheels*pq*are placed one way we get addition; if reversed, subtraction. Otherwise we may reverse by introducing an additional set of wheels between the wheels*pq*and the racks.This is the bare principle, admitting of many transformations, and making, like the other, no provision for carrying.

- In a letter written by Mr. Babbage to Arago in December 1839, the following explanation of the use of these cards is given. It probably conveys the idea in the fewest words possible. It is only necessary to add that their twofold employment embodies the separation of the symbols of operation from those of quantity. “You are aware that the system of cards which Jacquard invented are the means by which we can communicate to a very ordinary loom orders to weave any pattern that may be desired. Availing myself of the same beautiful invention, I have by similar means communicated to my calculating engine orders to calculate my formula however complicated; but I have also advanced one stage further, and I have communicated through the same means orders to follow certain laws in the use of those cards, and thus the calculating engine can solve any equations, eliminate between any number of variables, and perform the highest operations of analysis.”