Reading List: The Man Who Changed Everything
Friday, August 29, 2014 23:45
Reading List: Savage Continent
Thursday, August 21, 2014 22:53
Reading List: Black List
Tuesday, August 12, 2014 23:30
Reading List: Conversations with My Agent (and Set Up, Joke, Set Up, Joke)
Thursday, July 31, 2014 22:15
Reading List: Robert A. Heinlein: In Dialogue with His Century. Vol 1
Wednesday, July 30, 2014 02:27
Friday, August 29, 2014 23:45
- Mahon, Basil.
The Man Who Changed Everything.
Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
In the 19th century, science in general and physics in particular grew up,
assuming their modern form which is still recognisable today. At the start
of the century, the word “scientist” was not yet in use, and
the natural philosophers of the time were often amateurs. University
research in the sciences, particularly in Britain, was rare. Those
working in the sciences were often occupied by cataloguing natural
phenomena, and apart from Newton's monumental achievements, few people
focussed on discovering mathematical laws to explain the new physical
phenomena which were being discovered such as electricity and magnetism.
One person, James Clerk Maxwell, was largely responsible for creating the
way modern science is done and the way we think about theories of physics,
while simultaneously restoring Britain's standing in physics compared to
work on the Continent, and he created an institution which would continue
to do important work from the time of his early death until the present day.
While every physicist and electrical engineer knows of Maxwell and his
work, he is largely unknown to the general public, and even those who are
aware of his seminal work in electromagnetism may be unaware of the extent
his footprints are found all over the edifice of 19th century physics.
Maxwell was born in 1831 to a Scottish lawyer, John Clerk, and his wife Frances Cay.
Clerk subsequently inherited a country estate, and added “Maxwell”
to his name in honour of the noble relatives from whom he inherited it. His
son's first name, then was “James” and his surname “Clerk Maxwell”:
this is why his full name is always used instead of “James Maxwell”.
From childhood, James was curious about everything he encountered, and instead
of asking “Why?” over and over like many children, he drove his
parents to distraction with “What's the go o' that?”. His father
did not consider science a suitable occupation for his son and tried to direct
him toward the law, but James's curiosity did not extend to legal tomes and
he concentrated on topics that interested him. He published his first
scientific paper, on curves with more than two foci, at the age of 14.
He pursued his scientific education first at the University of Edinburgh
and later at Cambridge, where he graduated in 1854 with a degree in mathematics.
He came in second in the prestigious Tripos examination, earning the title of
Maxwell was now free to begin his independent research, and he turned
to the problem of human colour vision. It had been established that
colour vision worked by detecting the mixture of three primary colours,
but Maxwell was the first to discover that these primaries were red,
green, and blue, and that by mixing them in the correct proportion,
white would be produced. This was a matter to which Maxwell would
return repeatedly during his life.
In 1856 he accepted an appointment as a full professor and department head
at Marischal College, in Aberdeen Scotland. In 1857, the topic for the
prestigious Adams Prize was the nature of the rings of Saturn. Maxwell's
submission was a tour de force which
proved that the rings could not be either solid nor a liquid, and hence
had to be made of an enormous number of individually orbiting bodies.
Maxwell was awarded the prize, the significance of which was magnified
by the fact that his was the only submission: all of the others who
aspired to solve the problem had abandoned it as too difficult.
Maxwell's next post was at King's College London, where he investigated
the properties of gases and strengthened the evidence for the molecular
theory of gases. It was here that he first undertook to explain the
relationship between electricity and magnetism which had been discovered
by Michael Faraday. Working in the old style of physics, he constructed
an intricate mechanical thought experiment model which might explain the
lines of force that Faraday had introduced but which many scientists
thought were mystical mumbo-jumbo. Maxwell believed the alternative
of action at a distance without any intermediate mechanism was
wrong, and was able, with his model, to explain the phenomenon of
rotation of the plane of polarisation of light by a magnetic field,
which had been discovered by Faraday. While at King's College, to
demonstrate his theory of colour vision, he took and displayed the
first colour photograph.
Maxwell's greatest scientific achievement was done while living the life
of a country gentleman at his estate, Glenair. In his textbook,
A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, he presented
which showed that electricity and magnetism were
two aspects of the same phenomenon. This was the first of the great unifications
of physical laws which have continued to the present day. But that isn't
all they showed. The speed of light appeared as a conversion factor between
the units of electricity and magnetism, and the equations allowed solutions
of waves oscillating between an electric and magnetic field which could
propagate through empty space at the speed of light. It was compelling
to deduce that light was just such an electromagnetic wave, and that
waves of other frequencies outside the visual range must exist. Thus
was laid the foundation of wireless communication, X-rays, and gamma rays.
The speed of light is a constant in Maxwell's equations, not depending upon
the motion of the observer. This appears to conflict with Newton's laws
of mechanics, and it was not until Einstein's 1905 paper on
that the mystery would be resolved. In essence, faced with a dispute between
Newton and Maxwell, Einstein decided to bet on Maxwell, and he chose wisely.
Finally, when you look at Maxwell's equations (in their modern form, using
the notation of vector calculus), they appear lopsided. While they unify
electricity and magnetism, the symmetry is imperfect in that while a moving
electric charge generates a magnetic field, there is no magnetic charge which,
when moved, generates an electric field. Such a charge would be a
and despite extensive experimental searches, none has ever been found. The
existence of monopoles would make Maxwell's equations even more beautiful, but
sometimes nature doesn't care about that. By all evidence to date, Maxwell got it
In 1871 Maxwell came out of retirement to accept a professorship at Cambridge
and found the
which would focus on experimental science and elevate Cambridge to world-class
status in the field. To date, 29 Nobel Prizes have been awarded for work done
at the Cavendish.
Maxwell's theoretical and experimental work on heat and gases revealed
discrepancies which were not explained until the development of quantum
theory in the 20th century. His suggestion of
posed a deep puzzle in the foundations of thermodynamics which eventually,
a century later, showed the deep connections between information theory
and statistical mechanics. His practical work on automatic governors for
steam engines foreshadowed what we now call control theory. He played a key
part in the development of the units we use for electrical quantities.
By all accounts Maxwell was a modest, generous, and well-mannered man. He
wrote whimsical poetry, discussed a multitude of topics (although he had little
interest in politics), was an enthusiastic horseman and athlete (he would swim
in the sea off Scotland in the winter), and was happily married, with his wife
Katherine an active participant in his experiments. All his life, he supported
general education in science, founding a working men's college in Cambridge and
lecturing at such colleges throughout his career.
Maxwell lived only 48 years—he died in 1879 of the same cancer which had
killed his mother when he was only eight years old. When he fell ill, he was
engaged in a variety of research while presiding at the Cavendish Laboratory.
We shall never know what he might have done had he been granted another two
Apart from the significant achievements Maxwell made in a wide variety of
fields, he changed the way physicists look at, describe, and think about
natural phenomena. After using a mental model to explore electromagnetism,
he discarded it in favour of a mathematical description of its behaviour.
There is no theory behind Maxwell's equations: the equations are
the theory. To the extent they produce the correct results when
experimental conditions are plugged in, and predict new phenomena which
are subsequently confirmed by experiment, they are valuable. If they
err, they should be supplanted by something more precise. But they say
nothing about what is really going on—they only seek to
model what happens when you do experiments. Today, we are so accustomed
to working with theories of this kind: quantum mechanics, special and general
relativity, and the standard model of particle physics, that we don't think
much about it, but it was revolutionary in Maxwell's time. His mathematical
approach, like Newton's, eschewed explanation in favour of prediction: “We
have no idea how it works, but here's what will happen if you do this experiment.”
This is perhaps Maxwell's greatest legacy.
This is an excellent scientific biography of Maxwell which also gives the reader
a sense of the man. He was such a quintessentially normal person there aren't
a lot of amusing anecdotes to relate. He loved life, loved his work, cherished his
friends, and discovered the scientific foundations of the technologies which
allow you to read this. In the
Kindle edition, at least as read on an iPad, the text
appears in a curious, spidery, almost vintage, font in which periods are difficult to
distinguish from commas. Numbers sometimes have spurious spaces embedded within them,
and the index cites pages in the print edition which are useless since the Kindle
edition does not include real page numbers.
Thursday, August 21, 2014 22:53
- Lowe, Keith.
New York: Picador,  2013.
On May 8th, 1945, World War II in Europe formally ended when the Allies
accepted the unconditional surrender of Germany. In popular myth,
especially among those too young to have lived through the war and
its aftermath, the defeat of Italy and Germany ushered in, at least
in Western Europe not occupied by Soviet troops, a period of rebuilding
and rapid economic growth, spurred by the
Marshall Plan. The French
refer to the three decades from 1945 to 1975 as
Les Trente Glorieuses.
But that isn't what actually happened, as this book documents in detail.
Few books cover the immediate aftermath of the war, or concentrate
exclusively upon that chaotic period. The author has gone to great lengths
to explore little-known conflicts and sort out conflicting accounts of
what happened still disputed today by descendants of those involved.
The devastation wreaked upon cities where the conflict raged was extreme.
In Germany, Berlin, Hanover, Duisburg, Dortmund, and Cologne lost more
than half their habitable buildings, with the figure rising to 70% in
the latter city. From Stalingrad to Warsaw to Caen in France, destruction
was general with survivors living in the rubble. The transportation
infrastructure was almost completely obliterated, along with services
such as water, gas, electricity, and sanitation. The industrial plant
was wiped out, and along with it the hope of employment. This was the
state of affairs in May 1945, and the Marshall Plan did not begin to
deliver assistance to Western Europe until three years later,
in April 1948. Those three years were grim, and compounded by score-settling,
revenge, political instability, and multitudes of displaced people
returning to areas with no infrastructure to support them.
And this was in Western Europe. As is the case with just about everything
regarding World War II in Europe, the further east you go, the worse things
get. In the Soviet Union, 70,000 villages were destroyed, along with
32,000 factories. The redrawing of borders, particularly those of Poland
and Germany, set the stage for a paroxysm of ethnic cleansing and mass
migration as Poles were expelled from territory now incorporated into the
Soviet Union and Germans from the western part of Poland. Reprisals against
those accused of collaboration with the enemy were widespread, with
murder not uncommon. Thirst for revenge extended to the innocent, including
children fathered by soldiers of occupying armies.
The end of the War did not mean an end to the wars. As the author writes,
“The Second World War was therefore not only a traditional
conflict for territory: it was simultaneously a war of race, and a war
of ideology, and was interlaced with half a dozen civil wars fought for
purely local reasons.” Defeat of Germany did nothing to bring these
other conflicts to an end. Guerrilla wars continued in the Baltic states
annexed by the Soviet Union as partisans resisted the invader. An all-out
civil war between communists and anti-communists erupted in Greece and
was ended only through British and American aid to the anti-communists.
Communist agitation escalated to violence in Italy and France. And
country after country in Eastern Europe came under Soviet domination as
puppet regimes were installed through coups, subversion, or rigged
When reading a detailed history of a period most historians ignore, one
finds oneself exclaiming over and over, “I didn't know that!”,
and that is certainly the case here. This was a dark period, and no group
seemed immune from regrettable acts, including Jews liberated from Nazi
death camps and slave labourers freed as the Allies advanced: both sometimes
took their revenge upon German civilians. As the author demonstrates,
the aftermath of this period still simmers beneath the surface among the people
involved—it has become part of the identity of ethnic groups which will
outlive any person who actually remembers the events of the immediate
In addition to providing an enlightening look at this neglected period, the
events in the years following 1945 have much to teach us about those playing
out today around the globe. We are seeing long-simmering ethnic and religious
strife boil into open conflict as soon as the system is perturbed enough to
knock the lid off the kettle. Borders drawn by politicians mean little when
people's identity is defined by ancestry or faith, and memories are very long,
measured sometimes in centuries. Even after a cataclysmic conflict which levels
cities and reduces populations to near-medieval levels of subsistence, many
people do not long for peace but instead seek revenge. Economic growth
and prosperity can, indeed, change the attitude of societies and allow for
alliances among former enemies (imagine how odd the phrase
“Paris-Berlin axis”, heard today in discussions of the European
Union, would have sounded in 1946), but the results of a protracted
conflict can prevent the emergence of the very prosperity which might allow
consigning it to the past.
Tuesday, August 12, 2014 23:30
- Thor, Brad.
New York: Pocket Books, 2012.
This is the twelfth in the author's
Harvath series, which began with
The Lions of Lucerne (October 2010).
Brad Thor has remarked in interviews that he strives to write thrillers
which anticipate headlines which will break after their publication,
and with this novel he hits a grand slam.
Scot Harvath is ambushed in Paris by professional killers who murder
a member of his team. After narrowly escaping, he goes to ground and
covertly travels to a remote region in Basque country where he has
trusted friends. He is then attacked there, again by
trained killers, and he has to conclude that the probability is high
that the internal security of his employer, the Carlton Group, has
been breached, perhaps from inside.
Meanwhile, his employer, Reed Carlton, is attacked at his secure compound
by an assault team and barely escapes with his life. When Carlton tries
to use his back channels to contact members of his organisation, they all
appear to have gone dark. To Carlton, a career spook with tradecraft flowing
in his veins, this indicates his entire organisation has been wiped out,
for no apparent motive and by perpetrators unknown.
Harvath, Carlton, and the infovore dwarf Nicholas, operating independently,
must begin to pick up the pieces to figure out what is going on, while
staying under the radar of a pervasive surveillance state which employs
every technological means to track them down and target them for
summary extra-judicial elimination.
If you pick up this book and read it today, you might think it's based
upon the revelations of
about the abuses of the NSA
conducting warrantless surveillance on U.S. citizens. But it was published
in 2012, a full year before the first of Snowden's disclosures.
The picture of the total information awareness state here is,
if anything, more benign than what we now know to be the case in reality.
What is different is that when Harvath, Carlton, and Nicholas get to the
bottom of the mystery, the reaction in high places is what one would
hope for in a constitutional republic, as opposed to the
“USA! USA! USA!” cheerleading or silence which
has greeted the exposure of abuses by the NSA on the part of all too many
This is a prophetic thriller which demonstrates how the smallest compromises
of privacy: credit card transactions, telephone call metadata, license
plate readers, facial recognition, Web site accesses, search engine queries,
etc. can be woven into a dossier on any person of interest which makes going
dark to the snooper state equivalent to living technologically in 1950.
This not just a cautionary tale for individuals who wish to preserve a
wall of privacy around themselves from the state, but also a challenge for
writers of thrillers. Just as mobile telephones would have wrecked the
plots of innumerable mystery and suspense stories written before their
existence, the emergence of the
state will make it difficult for thriller writers to have both their
heroes and villains operating in the dark. I am sure the author will
rise to this challenge.
Thursday, July 31, 2014 22:15
- Long, Rob.
Conversations with My Agent (and Set Up, Joke, Set Up, Joke).
London: Bloomsbury Publishing, [1996, 2005] 2014.
Hollywood is a strange place, where the normal rules of business, economics,
and personal and professional relationships seem to have been suspended.
When he arrived in Hollywood in 1930,
P. G. Wodehouse
found the customs and antics of its denizens so bizarre that he parodied
them in a series of hilarious stories. After a year in Hollywood, he'd
had enough and never returned. When Rob Long arrived in Hollywood to attend
UCLA film school, the television industry was on the threshold of a
technology-driven change which would remake it and forever put an end to the
domination by three large networks which had existed since its inception.
The advent of cable and, later, direct to home satellite broadcasting
eliminated the terrestrial bandwidth constraints which had made establishing
a television outlet forbiddingly expensive and, at the same time, side-stepped
many of the regulatory constraints which forbade “edgy” content
on broadcast channels. Long began his television career as a screenwriter
in 1990, and became an executive producer of the show in 1992. After
the end of Cheers, he created and produced other television
Sullivan & Son,
which is currently on the air.
Television ratings measure both “rating points”: the absolute number of
television sets tuned into the program, and “share points”: the
fraction of television sets turned on at the time viewing the program.
In the era of Cheers, a typical episode might have a rating
equivalent to more than 22 million viewers and a share of 32%, meaning
it pulled in around one third of all television viewers in its time slot.
The proliferation of channels makes it unlikely any show will achieve numbers
like this again. The extremely popular
attracted between 9 and 14 million viewers in its eight seasons, and
the highly critically regarded
never topped a mean viewership of 2.7 million in its best season.
It was into this new world of diminishing viewership expectations but
voracious thirst for content to fill all the new channels that the
author launched his post-Cheers career. The present
volume collects two books originally published independently,
Conversations with My Agent from 1998, and
2005's Set Up, Joke, Set Up, Joke, written as
was well-advanced. The volumes fit
together almost seamlessly, and many readers will barely notice the
This is a very funny book, but there is also a great deal of wisdom
about the ways of Hollywood, how television projects are created,
pitched to a studio, marketed to a network, and the tortuous process
leading from concept to script to pilot to series and, all too often,
to cancellation. The book is written as a screenplay,
complete with scene descriptions, directions, dialogue, transitions,
and sound effect call-outs. Most of the scenes are indeed
conversations between the author and his agent in various
circumstances, but we also get to be a fly on the wall at story
pitches, meetings with the network, casting, shooting an episode,
focus group testing, and many other milestones in the life cycle of a
situation comedy. The circumstances are fictional, but are clearly
informed by real-life experience. Anybody contemplating a career in
Hollywood, especially as a television screenwriter, would be insane
not to read this book. You'll laugh a lot, but also learn something
on almost every page.
The reader will also begin to appreciate the curious ways of Hollywood
business, what the author calls “HIPE”: the Hollywood
Inversion Principle of Economics. “The HIPE, as it will come
to be known, postulates that every commonly understood, standard
business practice of the outside world has its counterpart in the
entertainment industry. Only it's backwards.” And anybody who
thinks accounting is not a creative profession has never had experience
with a Hollywood project. The culture of the entertainment business is
also on display—an intricate pecking order involving writers,
producers, actors, agents, studio and network executives, and “below
the line” specialists such as camera operators and editors, all of whom
have to read the trade papers to know who's up and who's not.
This book provides an insider's perspective on the strange way television
programs come to be. In a way, it resembles some aspects of venture
capital: most projects come to nothing, and most of those which are
funded fail, losing the entire investment. But the few which succeed
can generate sufficient money to cover all the losses and still yield
a large return. One television show that runs for five years, producing
solid ratings and 100+ episodes to go into syndication, can set up its
writers and producers for life and cover the studio's losses on all of
the dogs and cats.
Wednesday, July 30, 2014 02:27
- Patterson, William H., Jr.
Robert A. Heinlein: In Dialogue with His Century. Vol. 1
New York: Tor Books, 2010.
Robert Heinlein came from a family who had been present in America before there
were the United States, and whose members had served in all of the wars of the
Republic. Despite being thin, frail, and with dodgy eyesight, he managed to be
appointed to the U.S. Naval Academy where, despite demerits for being a hellion,
he graduated and was commissioned as a naval officer. He was on the track to a
naval career when felled by tuberculosis (which was, in the 1930s, a potential death
sentence, with the possibility of recurrence any time in later life).
Heinlein had written while in the Navy, but after his forced medical retirement,
turned his attention to writing science fiction for pulp magazines, and
after receiving a cheque for US$ 70 for his first short story,
he exclaimed, “How long has this racket been
going on? And why didn't anybody tell me about it sooner?” Heinlein
always viewed writing as a business, and kept a thermometer on which he
charted his revenue toward paying off the mortgage on his house.
While Heinlein fit in very well with the Navy, and might have been, absent
medical problems, a significant commander in the fleet in World War II,
he was also, at heart, a bohemian, with a soul almost orthogonal to military
tradition and discipline. His first marriage was a fling with a woman who
introduced him to physical delights of which he was unaware. That ended
quickly, and then he married Leslyn, who was his muse, copy-editor, and
business manager in a marriage which persisted throughout World War II,
when both were involved in war work. Leslyn worked herself in this effort
into insanity and alcoholism, and they divorced in 1947.
It was Robert Heinlein who vaulted science fiction from the ghetto of the
pulp magazines to the “slicks” such as Collier's and the
Saturday Evening Post. This was due to a technological transition
in the publishing industry which is comparable to that presently underway in
the migration from print to electronic publishing. Rationing of paper during
World War II helped to create the “pocket book” or paperback
publishing industry. After the end of the war, these new entrants in the
publishing market saw a major opportunity in publishing anthologies of stories
previously published in the pulps. The pulp publishers viewed this as an
existential threat—who would buy a pulp magazine if, for almost the same
price, one could buy a collection of the best stories from the last
decade in all of those magazines?
Heinlein found his fiction entrapped in this struggle. While today, when you sell
a story to a magazine in the U.S., you usually only sell “First North American
serial rights”, in the 1930s and 1940s, authors sold all rights, and it was
up to the publisher to release their rights for republication of a work in an
anthology or adaptation into a screenplay. This is parallel to the contemporary battle
between traditional publishers and independent publishing platforms, which have
become the heart of science fiction.
Heinlein was complex. While an exemplary naval officer, he was a nudist, married
three times, interested in the esoteric (and a close associate of
L. Ron Hubbard).
He was an enthusiastic supporter of
EPIC movement and
his “Social Credit” agenda.
This authorised biography, with major contributions from Heinlein's widow, Virginia,
chronicles the master storyteller's life in his first forty years—until he found,
or created, an audience receptive to the tales of wonder he spun. If you've read
all of Heinlein's fiction, it may be difficult to imagine how much of it was based in
Heinlein's own life. If you thought Heinlein's later novels were weird, appreciate
how the master was weird before you were born.
I had the privilege of meeting Robert and Virginia Heinlein in 1984. I shall always
cherish that moment.